Two topics are racing around inside my head these last
couple of days so I thought I would try to be succinct on both of them and
combine them into one post. The second portion of this post will be about the Press
and Donald Trump and the Press.
The first post is about the open carry law here in Texas
that starts January 1, 2016. I have to admit in my past I have gone skeet
shooting, duck hunting, and some other general back forty shooting so I
understand wanting to have the ability to own guns. What I do not understand is
the need to display guns in public.
And maybe I should have spoken up sooner or actually written
a letter to a legislator or something because I fear this is going to be a real
problem. And my fear is somewhat rational for most people I think.
First of all recent headlines show how dangerous this could
be such as from the terrorist shootings in California to the police
accidentally killing a third person while trying to apprehend and then shooting
two suspects in Chicago. Imagine people with guns at hand being involved in
these situations.
There is so much talk if people had guns then the shooters
in California could have been stopped, uh a big maybe at best and how fast
could others shoot them. And obviously now you have multiple people potentially
shooting at each other and the probability of more innocent victims getting hit
goes up. Or people who see police shooting deciding they need to “defend”
themselves and a full fledge gun battle breaks out. How many innocent victims
will there be now?
And then there is the usual road rage scenarios, people
getting into an argument, public fights, etc and the easier a gun is to access
the shorter amount of time you have to think about what you are about to do. Or
just seeing someone else with a gun may make you think you have to have yours.
I hate to think or even mention, but sooner or later some
real serious disasters are going to happen. It doesn’t take much for some idiot
who really cannot shoot a gun to go crazy in public trying to stop a robbery or
something and a whole bunch of people get shot
.
And like I mentioned I should have spoken up sooner and I
will throw others under the bus, such as anyone else who perceives how
dangerous this could be, and didn’t speak to our elected officials to stop this
law from happening. This is one problem of people not voting. State
Legislatures are not well attended elections hence a small group of people can
have an undue influence on the outcome of legislation so this looks like the
legislatures made all their hunting buddies and a few crazy groups happy with
this dangerous law. If we had larger turnouts of people voting then maybe more
common sense could have ruled when this came up for a vote.
I hope I am very wrong about my predictions, but if
something does happen I hope every legislative person and the Governor have to
answer for allowing this to come into play. There has to be some accountability
for not governing for the betterment of the whole of society instead of the
advantage or liking of a few.
So what is my beef with the press and my beef with the press
and Donald Trump. I have previously
posted about the failure of the fourth estate so this isn’t new.
I am going to be a tad more blunt this time.
First the rise of Donald Trump is because the press is
showing how and lazy and profit driven they have become. It is easy to write
stories about him. And he gets readers.
Forget trying to write and compare how all the candidates
compare on the issues. This takes work and it seems no one read these stories
in mass compared to the name calling Mr. Trump does to excite the masses. Yes I
know there are a few articles attempting to try to get an audience for a better
discussion etc of the election and candidates, but the vast majority of what
you read and see is what Trump said and what people are saying about Trump. Not
too many stories on what does Mr. Trump mean and how he actually proposes to
accomplish his rhetoric.
And it is partly the Press’ fault for this madness. They
have been headed in this direction for a very long time. Yes you can say it is
because the Press is owned by billionaires only looking out for their profits
and this is one aspect of the problem. In some ways our friend Rupert is
receiving some comeuppance now. There is no need to write anything people do
not want to read because it does not make money. So we read about the
Kardashians, or stories of corruption or sexual scandals in politics or sports
figures gone bad as lead stories because this is what “we” want. Reading about
others’ misfortune is fun.
Another fault is what our politicians did to education; or
did not do for education. No one wants more because we are taught not to expect
more. Or that we are unable to understand that the shallowness of modern news
is unhealthy and reflects and unhealthy society overall. Our politicians want
this because other than them getting caught with their pants down most people
do not pay too much attention to them. Or at least until election time, then we
vote in the people we know because we do not spend the time getting to know
them better. ( I think someone else said something similar before).
And then the Press does not want to push any buttons on
these people or help us understand our problems because they benefit from the status
quo. It is easier to fact check a debate than dive in and look at what they are
saying in depth. Keeping the Democrat’s and Republican’s institutions means
they have the news hand to them from people they know. They aren’t forced to
actually gather information. They can sit in their office and write opinions
based on their own bias instead of examining whether what elected officials are
doing is what is best overall.
Historically the Press has always been influenced by their
opinions, but there is a difference between what some of the Founding Fathers
wrote in the Federalist Papers and other publications trying to sway opinion
vs. what modern writers do with trying to tell us who we should vote for and
why we should hate so and so.
And the Press has been a profit driven business over the
course of our history; so how different is it nowadays? To me, quite a bit.
Yes, in the past there would be sensationalist stories, coverage of scandals,
even gossip, but the press would go out and work to get their stories, they
would dig, and even opinion pieces were based on long standing work. There was
much more original work. Today you still
get some of that, but overall people write quick hit articles for the internet,
many stories are reprints of something from the associated press. Sometimes you
get the same article four or five times just with a different headline. Looks
like there is four different stories, but nope. Everyone is trying to
capitalize on what someone else did and this leads to shallow coverage. The
less depth we have, the less we expect and over time we, the readers, become
accustomed to this drivel.
And I could go on. The Press has never been perfect and you
may remember terms like yellow journalism and muckraking, but what is going on
nowadays is different, but just as bad. The Press is shirking their responsibility
to a healthy democracy. They were given great freedoms by our Founding Fathers
and are now completely abandoning why they were given the freedoms and powers
that fall upon the press of a free democracy and republic.
One result is Donald Trump dominating the headlines because
he gets readers and only because he gets readers. Look at the amount of
coverage he receives versus Bernie Sanders. Mr. Sanders is taping into another
group of dissatisfied voters as Mr. Trump, but receives nowhere near the same
amount of coverage. Why? Mr. Sanders tries to do what he is suppose to do and
tell the people his goals and how he would like to achieve them. Mr. Trump just
tries to stay in the headlines with bombast and ridicule. And yet the weaker
message is the dominant message.
Remember the phrase: you get what you pay for? Nowadays we
are going to pay for what we are not getting.